I THANK THE
ORGANIZERS AND PETITION CIRCULATORS WHO WORKED HARD TO GATHER SIGNATURES AND
BRING LIGHT ONTO THE ONGOING NATIONAL DEBATE REGARDING THE WAR IN
FOR ME,
THIS ISSUE IS NOT ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THE QUESTION HAS MERIT WITHIN THE CITY
OR IF IT’S AN APPROPRIATE QUESTION FOR A REFERENDUM. I BELIEVE THE QUESTION IS APPROPRIATE AND I’M
NOT SURE ANYONE COULD LEGITIMATELY ARGUE THAT THE IRAQ WAR HAS NOT IMPACTED THE
CITY OF OSHKOSH – WHETHER PERSONAL THROUGH SERVICE OF A LOVED ONE AND BEING
AWAY FROM THE FAMILY OR THE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE, LOSS OF LIFE – BUSINESS THROUGH
THE LOSS OF AN EMPLOYEE – ECONOMIC THROUGH THE EXPENDITURE OF OUR TAX DOLLARS,
ETC. – THE CITY OF OSHKOSH HAS BEEN IMPACTED BY THIS WAR.
SOME PROPONENTS
OF THE REFERENDUM QUESTION SAY THEY WERE GIVEN WRONG/INACCURATE/INCORRECT
INFORMATION FROM THE CITY REGARDING DIRECT LEGISLATION. I AGREE AND AM VERY DISAPPOINTED ABOUT THAT. ACCORDING TO MR. KRAFT, HOWEVER, NOT ONE
PERSON FROM THE ORGANIZING GROUP CONTACTED HIM DIRECTLY EXCEPT FOR AN ORIGINAL
ORGANIZER STATING HE WOULD LIKE TO TALK WITH HIM ABOUT THE PETITION PROCESS
(THIS WAS DURING A BREAK AT ONE OF THE VERY FIRST SESSIONS OF THE NEW LOCAL
CITIZEN’S ACADEMY – BACK IN SEPT.). THAT INDIVIDUAL, HOWEVER, DID NOT FOLLOW UP
WITH MR. KRAFT.
I FEEL
BAD THAT THE GROUP GOT INCORRECT INFORMATION.
I ATTENDED THEIR FIRST ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING ON JULY 20TH AND
TOLD THEM WHAT I HAD ORIGINALLY BEEN TOLD BY THE CITY ATTORNEY – THAT NO MATTER
HOW MANY SIGNATURES THE GROUP COLLECTED, THIS WOULD NOT QUALIFY AS DIRECT LEGISLATION. HOWEVER, I RECALL DISCUSSION AT THAT MEETING
PERTAINING TO CONDUCTING THE PROCESS AS DIRECT LEGISLATION (60 DAYS, 15% OF
PREVIOUS GOVERNOR ELECTION NUMBERS – THE SPECIFIC NUMBER WAS EVEN DISCUSSED)
AND THAT IT WOULD BE PRESENTED TO THE
NOW, SOME
OPPONENTS SAY THIS IS NOT A CITY ISSUE AND NOT SOMETHING THE COUNCIL SHOULD BE
DEBATING. SOME EVEN SAY THIS TYPE OF
DISCUSSION OR DEBATE IS BAD FOR OUR TROOPS OR WILL HELP THE TERRORISTS. I COULDN’T DISAGREE MORE. THE BEAUTY OF OUR SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IS
THAT WE CAN DEBATE, EVEN VEHEMENTLY, THIS ISSUE (AND OTHERS LIKE IT), WITHOUT
CAR BOMBS, IEDS, GUERILLA ATTACKS, ETC.
AFTER ALL, WASN’T THE SPREAD OF THIS TYPE OF DEMOCRACY ONE OF THE
REASONS WHY WE WERE TOLD WE MUST GO TO WAR AND LIBERATE
IT NOW
BOILS DOWN TO THIS: WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE
I BELIEVE
IF WE, THE
WHILE I
BELIVE IT IS APPROPRIATE TO HAVE A QUESTION SUCH AS THIS ON A BALLOT,
PREFERABLY THE NOVEMBER BALLOT SINCE IT’S A NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL ISSUE WITH
LOCAL IMPACT AND NOVEMBER IS WHEN WE CAST OUR VOTES FOR NATIONAL ELECTIONS, I
DO NOT FEEL IT IS THE OSHKOSH COMMON COUNCIL WHO SHOULD PLACE THIS QUESTION ON
THE BALLOT. THE APRIL ELECTIONS SHOULD BE
ABOUT LOCAL CANDIDATES AND THEIR VISION FOR THE CITY OF
I WELCOME
THE CHANCE TO VOTE ON THIS ITEM IN THE VOTING BOOTH, HOWEVER, BELIEVE IT SHOULD
COME FROM THE DIRECT LEGISLATION PROCESS AND NOT THE COUNCIL.
SOME PEOPLE
WILL SAY IT DOES NOT MATTER HOW MANY SIGNATURES WERE GATHERED, THAT THIS IS NOW
A COUNCIL-INITIATED ITEM. WHILE I DO NOT
DISAGREE, I AGAIN BELIEVE SOMETHING LIKE THIS SHOULD COME FROM A PETITIONING
PROCESS AND BE PLACED ON THE BALLOT VIA DIRECT LEGISLATION, NOT THE COUNCIL.
SOME PEOPLE
WILL SAY THAT, BY NOT PLACING THIS ON THE BALLOT, I AND OTHER MEMBERS OF THE
COUNCIL ARE NOT LISTENING TO THE PEOPLE OF THE COMMUNITY. I DISAGREE.
I’VE RECEIVED QUITE A BIT OF CONTACT REGARDING THIS ISSUE – ALMOST EQUAL
OR 50-50 FOR AND AGAINST THE REFERENDUM QUESTION. ALL OF IT HELPED MAKE MY DECISION.
SOME
PEOPLE WILL SAY THAT BY NOT PLACING THIS REFERENDUM QUESTION ON THE BALLOT, THE
COUNCIL IS SUBVERTING THE DEMOCRATIC (SMALL ‘D’) PROCESS. AGAIN, I DISAGREE. SUBVERTING THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS WOULD BE
THIS COUNCIL DENYING A REFERENDUM QUESTION WHEN PETITIONS SUBMITTED HAD THE
REQUIRED NUMBER OF SIGNATURES COLLECTED WITHIN THE ALLOTED TIMEFRAME. THAT HAS NOT HAPPENED. IF ANYTHING, THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS WORKED –
AN IDEA WAS BROUGHT FORWARD, CITIZENS EXPRESSED THEIR VIEWS, COUNCIL MEMBERS
DID THE SAME AND A VOTE TOOK PLACE.
I,
HONESTLY, DID NOT MAKE MY DECISION ON HOW I WOULD VOTE UNTIL TODAY, TAKING FULL
ADVANTAGE TO LISTEN, ASK QUESTIONS AND DELIBERATE. I KNOW MY DECISION WILL DISAPPOINT SOME WHILE
OTHERS WILL APPROVE. HOWEVER, THIS IS
NOT ABOUT HOW I PERSONALLY FEEL ABOUT THE WAR.
I MADE MY DECISION BASED ON HOW I SAID I WOULD IN THE PREVIOUS ELECTION
– LISTEN, GATHER INFORMATION, ASK QUESTIONS – IN OTHER WORDS, “DO MY HOMEWORK”
– IN ORDER TO MAKE THE BEST DECISION POSSIBLE FOR THE CITY OF
I AGAIN
THANK THE ORGANIZERS, THOSE HERE THIS EVENING AND THOSE WHO PREVIOUSLY CONTACTED
ME. I ENCOURAGE THE ORGANIZERS TO CIRCULATE
NEW PETITIONS, COLLECT THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF SIGNATURES WITHIN THE ALLOTED TIME
FRAME AND SUBMIT THEM TO THE CITY CLERK.
AND ONCE THEY ARE CERTIFIED, YOU HAVE MY WORD THAT I WILL BE FIRST IN
LINE, WITHOUT ANY HESITATION, TO VOTE “YES” TO PUT THE REFERENDUM QUESTION ON
THE NOVEMBER BALLOT.
FOR THE
REASONS STATED ABOVE, I CANNOT SUPPORT A DECISION FOR THE COMMON COUNCIL TO
PLACE THIS ITEM ON THE BALLOT AND WILL VOTE AGAINST TONIGHT’S RESOLUTION.